Freethought Archives > Walter R. Cassels > A Reply to Dr Lightfoot's Essays

[V. - FOOTNOTES]

[130:1] I. p. 210 f.

[132:1] I. p. 213 ff. I have italicised a few phrases.

[133:1] S. R. i. 259 ff. See further illustrations here.

[134:1] S. R. i. p. 363 f.

[135:1] S. R. ii. p. 221, n. 7.

[135:2] Ibid. p. 220.

[135:3] Ibid. ii. p. 169 f.

[136:1] S. R. ii. p. 226.

[136:2] In discussing the authenticity of fragments ascribed to Melito, Dr. Lightfoot quoted, as an argument from Supernatural Religion the following words: "They have, in fact, no attestation whatever except that of the Syriac translation, which is unknown and which, therefore, is worthless." The passage appeared thus in the Contemporary Review, and now is again given in the same form in the present volume. I presume that the passage which Dr. Lightfoot intends to quote is: "They have no attestation whatever, except that of the Syriac translator, who is unknown, and which is, therefore, worthless" (S. R. ii. p. 181). If Dr. Lightfoot, who has so much assistance in preparing his works for the press, can commit such mistakes, he ought to be a little more charitable to those who have none.

[137:1] S. R. ii. p. 182 ff.

[137:2] Ibid. p. 239.

[137:3] Ibid. p. 248.

 


Return to Chapter V

    Table of Contents

HTML © 2002 -